![]() This difference, while visible in the raw file, is mediated by sharpening and contrast adjustments in Lightrooom. For example, when he face of a puffin is shaded, my lens will resolve the fine facial feathers better than my wife's. Secondly, the 200-400 will resolve shadow details better than the 200-500. Target acquisition is improved with a better camera (i.e. The 200-400 will lock onto a target faster than the 200-500. The real difference between our lenses appear in two specific occasions. She typically stopped down to f7.1 or f8 as did I. ![]() Granted, my wife used the D7100 and the ISO and AF performance are not equal to my camera, but when comparing similar images, her lens produced amazingly sharp photos in the 400mm to 500mm range. While I am still immersed in the editing process, I can safely say that the 200-500 is 90% (or so) of the 200-400. While shooting puffins she worked with her kit and I worked with mine. We just returned from Iceland where we did a mix of bird and landscape photography. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |